........SILAHKAN MENGGUNAKAN " MESIN TRANSLATE "..GOOGLE TRANSLATE
DISAMPING KANAN INI.............
PLEASE USE ........ "TRANSLATE MACHINE" .. GOOGLE TRANSLATE BESIDE RIGHT THIS
Drug trafficking
leads to deforestation in Central America
Date:
January 30,
2014
Source:
Ohio State University
Summary:
Add yet another threat to the list
of problems facing the rapidly disappearing rainforests of Central America:
drug trafficking. In a new study, researchers who have done work in Central
America point to growing evidence that drug trafficking threatens forests in
remote areas of Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and nearby countries.
Add yet
another threat to the list of problems facing the rapidly disappearing
rainforests of Central America: drug trafficking.
In an
article in the journal Science, seven researchers who have done work in
Central America point to growing evidence that drug trafficking threatens
forests in remote areas of Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and nearby countries.
Traffickers
are slashing down forests, often within protected areas, to make way for
clandestine landing strips and roads to move drugs, and converting forests into
agribusinesses to launder their drug profits, the researchers say.
Much of this
appears to be a response to U.S.-led anti-trafficking efforts, especially in
Mexico, said Kendra McSweeney, lead author of the Science article and an
associate professor of geography at The Ohio State University.
"In response
to the crackdown in Mexico, drug traffickers began moving south into Central
America around 2007 to find new routes through remote areas to move their drugs
from South America and get them to the United States," McSweeney said.
"When
drug traffickers moved in, they brought ecological devastation with them."
For example,
the researchers found that the amount of new deforestation per year more than
quadrupled in Honduras between 2007 and 2011 -- the same period when cocaine
movements in the country also spiked.
McSweeney is
a geographer who has done research in Honduras for more than 20 years, studying
how indigenous people interact with their environment. The drug trade is not
something she would normally investigate, but it has been impossible to ignore
in recent years, she said.
"Starting
about 2007, we started seeing rates of deforestation there that we had never
seen before. When we asked the local people the reason, they would tell us:
"los narcos" (drug traffickers)."
There were
other indications of drug trafficking taking place in the area.
"I
would get approached by people who wanted to change $20 bills in places where
cash is very scarce and dollars are not the normal currency. When that starts
happening, you know narcos are there," she said.
When
McSweeney talked to other researchers in Central America, they had similar
stories.
"The
emerging impacts of narco-trafficking were being mentioned among people who
worked in Central America, but usually just as a side conversation. We heard
the same kinds of things from agricultural specialists, geographers,
conservationists. Several of us decided we needed to bring more attention to
this issue."
In the Science
article, McSweeney and her co-authors say deforestation starts with the
clandestine roads and landing strips that traffickers create in the remote
forests. The infusion of drug cash into these areas helps embolden resident
ranchers, land speculators and timber traffickers to expand their activities,
primarily at the expense of the indigenous people who are often key forest
defenders.
In addition,
the drug traffickers themselves convert forest to agriculture as a way to
launder their money. While much of this land conversion occurs within protected
areas and is therefore illegal, drug traffickers often use their profits to
influence government leaders to look the other way.
McSweeney
said more research is needed to examine the links between drug trafficking and
conservation issues. But there is already enough evidence to show that U.S.
drug policy has a much wider effect than is often realized.
"Drug
policies are also conservation policies, whether we realize it or not,"
McSweeney said.
"U.S.-led
militarized interdiction, for example, has succeeded mainly in moving
traffickers around, driving them to operate in ever-more remote, biodiverse
ecosystems. Reforming drug policies could alleviate some of the pressures on
Central America's disappearing forests."
The paper
was co-authored by Erik Neilsen and Ophelia Wang of Northern Arizona
University; Matthew Taylor of the University of Denver; David Wrathall of
United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security in Bonn,
Germany; Spencer Plumb of the University of Idaho; and Zoe Pearson, a graduate
student in geography at Ohio State.
The research
was supported in part by the National Geographic Society, Association of
American Geographers, Ohio State and Northern Arizona University.
Story
Source:
The above
story is based on materials
provided by Ohio State University. The
original article was written by Jeff Grabmeier. Note: Materials may be
edited for content and length.
Journal
Reference:
- Kendra Mcsweeney, Erik A. Nielsen, Matthew J. Taylor, David J. Wrathall, Zoe Pearson, Ophelia Wang, Spencer T. Plumb. Drug Policy as Conservation Policy: Narco-Deforestation. Science, 2014 DOI: 10.1126/science.1244082