SILAHKAN MENGGUNAKAN " MESIN TRANSLATE "..GOOGLE TRANSLATE
DISAMPING KANAN INI.............
PLEASE USE ........ "TRANSLATE MACHINE" .. GOOGLE TRANSLATE BESIDE RIGHT THIS
....................................
DISAMPING KANAN INI.............
PLEASE USE ........ "TRANSLATE MACHINE" .. GOOGLE TRANSLATE BESIDE RIGHT THIS
....................................
Menguraikan
jaring laba-laba: studi genetika laba-laba genetika menunjukkan
laba-laba penenun bola tidak berbagi kesamaan asal-usul
Untangling spider's webs: Largest-ever study of spider genetics shows orb
weaver spiders do not share common origins
Date:
July 17,
2014
Source:
Harvard University
Summary:
The largest-ever phylogenetic study of spiders shows
that, contrary to long-held popular opinion, the two groups of spiders that
weave orb-shaped webs do not share a single origin.
.....................
For decades, the story of spider evolution went like this:
As insects became more and more diverse, with some species taking to the skies,
spiders evolved new hunting strategies, including the ability to weave
orb-shaped webs to trap their prey.
From that
single origin, the story goes, orb-weaver spiders diverged along different
evolutionary paths, leading to today, where several species weave similar --
though not identical -- webs.
It's a good
story, but there's just one problem -- Harvard scientists now know it's not
true.
The
largest-ever phylogenetic study of spiders, conducted by postdoctoral student
Rosa Fernández, Gonzalo Giribet, Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology, and
Gustavo Hormiga, a professor at George Washington University, shows that,
contrary to long-held popular opinion, the two groups of spiders that weave
orb-shaped webs do not share a single origin. The study is described in a July
17 paper published in Current Biology.
"This
study examines two different groups of orb-weaver spiders, as well as several
other species," Giribet said. "Using thousands of genes, we did a
comparative phylogenetic analysis, and what we now know is there is not a
single origin for the orb-weaver spiders.
"There
are two possible explanations for this," he continued. "One is that
the orb web evolved far back in the lineage of the two groups, but has been
lost in some groups. The other option is that the orb web evolved independently
in these two groups. We still haven't resolved that question yet -- we need to
sample many more of these intermediate groups before we can say which option is
correct."
The belief
that orb-weaver spiders shared a common origin, Giribet said, came largely from
earlier morphological studies.
Even as new
genetic tools became more commonplace in the last two decades, the single
origin theory held sway, in part, because early phylogenetic studies relied on
just a handful of genes to draw a picture of the spider evolutionary tree.
"Some
early analyses pointed out that spiders with orb webs didn't form a group --
they appeared in different places along the tree," Giribet said. "But
the genes that were being used weren't enough to elucidate the evolution of a
very diverse group like spiders, so most people dismissed many of those
results."
In recent
years, however, sequencing technology has dropped dramatically in cost, meaning
researchers who once were able to study only a handful of genes can now examine
the entire genome of a particular organism.
"The
technology has changed what we are able to do in terms of the questions we can
ask and the questions we can answer," Giribet continued. "Even just
five years ago, we were spending thousands of dollars to sequence 3,000 genes.
Today, we're spending just a few hundreds of dollars to sequence millions,
which is almost an entire genome.
In the case
of Giribet and Fernández, the technology allowed them to sequence genes from 14
different spiders, creating the largest genomic data set for the study of
spiders.
"This
paper is at the forefront of how these large data sets are being analyzed, and
how we are now constructing phylogenies using molecular data," Giribet
said. "We can now test all possible pitfalls of phylogenetic interference
to make sure our results are as accurate as possible."
Though his
hunch, Giribet said, is that the two orb-weaver groups evolved independently,
he's now designing a study that will examine the genetics of as many as 150
spider species to test that hypothesis.
While the
two groups create very similar webs, he said, their strategies for using them,
how they manufacture silk, and even the silk used to construct them are very
different. While one group passively uses their web to catch prey, some species
in the other use it like a net, holding it between their legs, and trapping
insects with it.
"Their
behaviors are very different, the types of silk are very different -- it's my
bet that these would be two separate evolutions of a similar structure of
web," Giribet said. "But we need to further test it, and we are now
looking to expand this study to include as many as 150 different spiders."
Story
Source:
The above
story is based on materials provided by Harvard University. Note: Materials may be edited
for content and length.
Journal
Reference:
- Rosa Fernández, Gustavo Hormiga, Gonzalo Giribet. Phylogenomic Analysis of Spiders Reveals Nonmonophyly of Orb Weavers. Current Biology, 2014; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.035