Face to face bullying lebih buruk dari serangan cyber --T-REC-komunitas reptil-semarang--KSE-komunitas satwa eksotik

SILAHKAN MENGGUNAKAN " MESIN TRANSLATE "..GOOGLE TRANSLATE
DISAMPING KANAN INI.............

PLEASE USE ........ "TRANSLATE MACHINE" .. GOOGLE TRANSLATE BESIDE RIGHT THIS

.................


T-REC -TUGUMUDA REPTILES COMMUNITY-INDONESIA


More info :
www.trecsemarang2011.blogspot.com
minat gabung : ( menerima keanggotaan seluruh kota dan daerah di Indonesia )
08995557626
..................................
KSE – KOMUNITAS SATWA EKSOTIK – EXOTIC PETS COMMUNITY-- INDONESIA
Visit Our Community and Joint W/ Us....Welcome All Over The World
www.facebook.com/groups/komunitassatwaeksotik/
 KSE = KOMUNITAS SATWA EKSOTIK

MENGATASI KENDALA MINAT DAN JARAK

KAMI ADA DI TIAP KOTA DI INDONESIA
DETAIL TENTANG KSE-----KLIK : www.komunitassatwaeksotik-pendaftaran.blogspot.com

GABUNG......... ( menerima keanggotaan seluruh kota dan daerah di Indonesia )
HUBUNGI   :  089617123865

.........................

Face to face bullying lebih  buruk dari serangan cyber 

Face- to-face bullying adalah lebih kejam dan kasar daripada serangan online , ..... . Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara signifikan  korban lebih merasakan intimidasi  menjadi lebih keras dan kejam dari cyberbullying . " Ini jelas menunjukkan perasaan anak-anak dan ancaman yang sangat nyata  mereka miliki secara fisik yang dirugikan oleh anak lain , " kata peneliti utama .....read more

Face-to-face
bullying worse than cyber-attacks, students say

Date:

March 11, 2015

Source:

Queensland University
of Technology

Summary:

Face-to-face bullying
is more cruel and harsh than online attacks, a survey of school students found.
The findings of this study indicate that significantly more victims perceived
traditional bullying to be more harsh and cruel than cyberbullying. "It
clearly indicates the feelings of the children and the very real threat they
have of being physically harmed by another child," the lead investigator
said.

.................................

 You see their smile, hear their laugh, see their
face, see you break down," girl student, 12.

"Because you can't block face-to-face bullying," boy student, 16.

Both children were among 156 students who participated in an Australian
study, led by QUT, to describe their perceptions of being bullied.

The research, led and supervised by Professor Marilyn Campbell from QUT's
Faculty of Education, investigated the students' responses to both cyber and
face-to-face bullying and asked which was more hurtful.

The study was published February issue of the Journal of School
Violence titled "Students' Perceptions of Their Own
Victimization: A youth voice perspective."

Professor Campbell said the findings indicated significantly more victims
perceived traditional bullying to be more harsh and cruel than cyberbullying.

"It clearly indicates the feelings of the children and the very real
threat they have of being physically harmed by another child," she said.

She said earlier studies found Australian school students reported the
highest prevalence of peer aggression among OECD countries.

Professor Campbell said the study showed 59 percent of the children
participants felt face-to-face bullying was worse for them than being
cyberbullied.

Twenty-six per cent reported that both forms of bullying were equally
hurtful and the remaining 15 per cent perceived cyberbullying to be worse.

"Children reported being scared and very worried by the attacks but it
was interesting to find a majority of them were embarrassed that others were
witnessing their victimisation as it occurred," Professor Campbell said.

She said recent Australian studies have reported traditional victimisation
prevalence rates of between 16 and 40 per cent among students.

She also said a 2008 survey of about 40 countries found Australian primary
schools had the highest reported incidence of bullying in the world.

She also said a review of Australian studies found a conservative
prevalence estimate for being cyberbullied in a 12-month period was
approximately 20 per cent of children aged between eight to 17.

The participants, involved in the latest research, were drawn from a larger
case study sample of 3,112 students from across 29 different schools in
Queensland, Victoria and South Australia.

She said the focus of the research was to give "voice" to
students who reported being targeted by both traditional bullies and
cyberbullies.

"Few studies have directly examined the perceptions of students who have
experienced both forms of bullying and explored which form was worse for
them," she said.

Professor Campbell said the perceptions of the students challenged a number
of suppositions presented in other literature that attempted to explain why
cyberbullying was associated with more negative outcomes than traditional or
face-to-face bullying.

She said many students noted that it was their ability or inability to take
some form of action in response to their victimisation that was a defining
reason as to why they perceived their experiences as they did.

Professor Campbell said taking action against the person who cyberbullied
them took the form of deleting a message or 'blocking' a bully.

A girl, 12, said: "I was upset that the person who cyberbullied me hid
behind the computer like a coward."

And a boy, 15, said: "Because being physically abused is a lot worse
than being abused by a pathetic loser over the Internet."

She said other students referred to the distance created by technology and
indicated that traditional bullying was worse than cyberbullying because:
"It was real, live communication, not done digitally, it cuts
deeper," girl, 14.

"These students specifically referred to the proximity of the bully
during the incidents which suggests proximity makes it more emotionally
impacting than when it is buffered by the distance that the online setting
provides," Dr Campbell said.

She said the children's reactions included feeling hurt, depressed,
frightened, anxious, embarrassed and worthless.

Professor Campbell said based on these responses it appeared that when
students felt significantly helpless to act in response to their victimisation,
it affected their interpretation of which form of bullying was worse.

She said the study had ramifications for schools and guidance counsellors.

"It is also important to involve students and student leaders in
anti-bullying programs as teachers are already dealing with a crowded
curriculum," she said.







Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Queensland University of
Technology. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.







Journal Reference:

1.    Emma-Kate Corby, Marilyn Campbell,
Barbara Spears, Phillip Slee, Des Butler, Sally Kift. Students’
Perceptions of Their Own Victimization: A Youth Voice Perspective. Journal
of School Violence, 2014; 1 DOI:10.1080/15388220.2014.996719

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/03/150311091046.htm

Share this: