DISAMPING KANAN INI.............
PLEASE USE ........ "TRANSLATE MACHINE" .. GOOGLE TRANSLATE BESIDE RIGHT THIS
..................
Neanderthals
were not inferior to modern humans, study finds
Date:
April 30,
2014
Source:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Summary:
If you think Neanderthals were stupid and primitive,
it's time to think again. The widely held notion that Neanderthals were
dimwitted and that their inferior intelligence allowed them to be driven to
extinction by the much brighter ancestors of modern humans is not supported by
scientific evidence.
..........................
If you think Neanderthals were stupid and primitive, it's
time to think again.
The widely
held notion that Neanderthals were dimwitted and that their inferior
intelligence allowed them to be driven to extinction by the much brighter
ancestors of modern humans is not supported by scientific evidence, according
to a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder.
Neanderthals
thrived in a large swath of Europe and Asia between about 350,000 and 40,000
years ago. They disappeared after our ancestors, a group referred to as
"anatomically modern humans," crossed into Europe from Africa.
In the past,
some researchers have tried to explain the demise of the Neanderthals by
suggesting that the newcomers were superior to Neanderthals in key ways,
including their ability to hunt, communicate, innovate and adapt to different
environments.
But in an
extensive review of recent Neanderthal research, CU-Boulder researcher Paola
Villa and co-author Wil Roebroeks, an archaeologist at Leiden University in the
Netherlands, make the case that the available evidence does not support the
opinion that Neanderthals were less advanced than anatomically modern humans.
Their paper was published today in the journal PLOS ONE.
"The
evidence for cognitive inferiority is simply not there," said Villa, a
curator at the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History. "What we
are saying is that the conventional view of Neanderthals is not true."
Villa and
Roebroeks scrutinized nearly a dozen common explanations for Neanderthal
extinction that rely largely on the notion that the Neanderthals were inferior
to anatomically modern humans. These include the hypotheses that Neanderthals
did not use complex, symbolic communication; that they were less efficient
hunters who had inferior weapons; and that they had a narrow diet that put them
at a competitive disadvantage to anatomically modern humans, who ate a broad
range of things.
The
researchers found that none of the hypotheses were supported by the available
research. For example, evidence from multiple archaeological sites in Europe
suggests that Neanderthals hunted as a group, using the landscape to aid them.
Researchers
have shown that Neanderthals likely herded hundreds of bison to their death by
steering them into a sinkhole in southwestern France. At another site used by
Neanderthals, this one in the Channel Islands, fossilized remains of 18
mammoths and five woolly rhinoceroses were discovered at the base of a deep
ravine. These findings imply that Neanderthals could plan ahead, communicate as
a group and make efficient use of their surroundings, the authors said.
Other
archaeological evidence unearthed at Neanderthal sites provides reason to
believe that Neanderthals did in fact have a diverse diet. Microfossils found
in Neanderthal teeth and food remains left behind at cooking sites indicate
that they may have eaten wild peas, acorns, pistachios, grass seeds, wild
olives, pine nuts and date palms depending on what was locally available.
Additionally,
researchers have found ochre, a kind of earth pigment, at sites inhabited by
Neanderthals, which may have been used for body painting. Ornaments have also
been collected at Neanderthal sites. Taken together, these findings suggest
that Neanderthals had cultural rituals and symbolic communication.
Villa and
Roebroeks say that the past misrepresentation of Neanderthals' cognitive
ability may be linked to the tendency of researchers to compare Neanderthals,
who lived in the Middle Paleolithic, to modern humans living during the more
recent Upper Paleolithic period, when leaps in technology were being made.
"Researchers
were comparing Neanderthals not to their contemporaries on other continents but
to their successors," Villa said. "It would be like comparing the
performance of Model T Fords, widely used in America and Europe in the early
part of the last century, to the performance of a modern-day Ferrari and
conclude that Henry Ford was cognitively inferior to Enzo Ferrari."
Although
many still search for a simple explanation and like to attribute the
Neanderthal demise to a single factor, such as cognitive or technological
inferiority, archaeology shows that there is no support for such
interpretations, the authors said.
But if
Neanderthals were not technologically and cognitively disadvantaged, why didn't
they survive?
The
researchers argue that the real reason for Neanderthal extinction is likely
complex, but they say some clues may be found in recent analyses of the
Neanderthal genome over the last several years. These genomic studies suggest
that anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals likely interbred and that the
resulting male children may have had reduced fertility. Recent genomic studies
also suggest that Neanderthals lived in small groups. All of these factors
could have contributed to the decline of the Neanderthals, who were eventually
swamped and assimilated by the increasing numbers of modern immigrants.
Story
Source:
The above
story is based on materials provided by University of Colorado at Boulder. Note:
Materials may be edited for content and length.
Journal
Reference:
- Paola Villa, Wil Roebroeks. Neandertal Demise: An Archaeological Analysis of the Modern Human Superiority Complex. PLoS ONE, 2014; 9 (4): e96424 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096424
Cite This
Page:
University of Colorado at Boulder.
"Neanderthals were not inferior to modern humans, study finds."
ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 30 April 2014.
<www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140430133054.htm>.